White Roofs Win As 'Coolest' Roof

by Heleigh Bostwick

It’s no surprise that white roofs triumph over black ones
when it comes to mitigating climate change, but as a recent study points out – on economics at least, white roofs also beat out green roofs.

"Both white and green roofs do a good job at cooling the
building and cooling the air in a city, but white roofs are three times more effective at countering climate change than green roofs," says Arthur Rosenfeld, scientist emeritus at Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, and co-author of their report that compares white, green, and black roofs based on economic benefits.

The study compares the three kinds of roofs on their cost-effectiveness over a 50-year time span by analyzing 22 commercial flat roof projects. It assumes a 20-year life for white and black roofs and 40 years for green roofs.

As the world’s populations move to cities, heat islands are an increasing driver of global warming and human health problems. Carbon absorbing trees and soil are replaced by black, heat-absorbing roads and roofs, raising surface temperatures by as much as six degrees Fahrenheit.

Cool Roofs

While green roofs provide stormwater management and clean the air along with other benefits, they don’t cut energy use as much, the study concludes. White roofs reflect about three times more sunlight than green roofs – they can be 50°F cooler during the heat of summer, keeping building interiors several degrees cooler. 

This was clearly demonstrated last spring in Chicago’s
"Battle of the Bulbs" competition
when two buildings – one with a green roof, the other with a white roof – competed on which had lower electric bills. The white roof won, saving more than $40,000 in electric bills over the green roof.

And white roofs are cheap – all it takes is a coat of paint, while it costs $10-$35 per square foot for a green roof. 

"When we started the study it wasn’t obvious that white roofs would still be more cost-effective over the long run, taking into account the longer service time of a green roof," notes Benjamin Mandel of Berkeley Lab.

Another study by the Environmental Protection Agency offers more refined results. Scientists found that white roofs save more energy in warmer climates. In northern climates, cooling a building could require more use of heating fuels in the winter, they say. Although green roofs don’t cool a building as well in the summer, they may keep northern buildings slightly warmer in the winter.

One thing that’s certain is that black roofs have got to go – in addition to being a poor choice in terms of energy bills and climate change, they pose significant health risks during the summer in urban areas. 

"In Chicago’s July 1995 heat wave a major risk factor in
mortality was living on the top floor of a building with a black roof," says Rosenfeld. He hopes the study will influence government policymakers to ban or at least phase out black roofs in warmer climates. 

"White roofs win based on the purely economic factors we
included, and black roofs should be phased out," he says.

But, Berkeley Labs also points to the benefits of green roofs that could make them more attractive than white roofs, even though they cost much more.  

If the goal is to reduce storm water runoff and improve air quality, white roofs just don’t stack up, Chris Brunner, co-founder of New York Green Roofs, told Scientific American. The air around green roofs can be 62 degrees F cooler – just slightly behind street trees.

The folks in Chicago agree. Thanks to City Hall’s green
roof, 60% less water flows through the city’s storm sewers during rainfall events and the plants growing there provide habitat for birds, insects, and other wildlife, as well as absorb greenhouse gas emissions. 
Then there’s the aesthetic value of green roofs, which
often double as open space park land. 
They also increase the energy production of solar panels.

While cool roofs have been part of building standards in California since 2005, and are used in nearly two-thirds of flat, commercial installations in the West, they have yet to really take off elsewhere. 

In Los Angeles – the first city to mandate cool roofs on homes – a study finds the switch will not only reduce the heat island effect, but it can save $30 million on energy bills, cutting greenhouse gases as much as taking 7 million cars off the road for a year. 

New York City has 30-40 square miles of "useless black roofs," says climatologist Stuart Gaffin at Columbia University’s Center for Climate Systems and Research. He’s studying how green roofs conserve water and cool urban heat islands.

That’s changing with NYC’s CoolRoofs program, where volunteers paint millions of square feet a year.

"Cool roofs are one of the quickest and lowest cost ways we can reduce our global carbon emissions and begin the hard work of slowing climate change," said Steven Chu, former Secretary of the Department of Energy, as he directed the agency to install them during renovations. 

In 2009, Rosenfeld co-authored a study that estimates the world could offset 44 billion tons of carbon emissions by making roofs and pavements more reflective. Another study shows that cool roofs could offset the emissions of roughly 300 million cars for 20 years.

Read the report, "Economic Comparison of White, Green, and Black Flat Roofs in the United States":

Website: [sorry this link is no longer available]     
(Visited 9,201 times, 190 visits today)

Comments on “White Roofs Win As 'Coolest' Roof”

  1. Jörg Breuning

    White Roofs are Better than Green Roof?
    According a study from prestigious researches at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, One Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States and School of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, reflective roofs have a higher value for building owners than Green Roofs.
    Julian Sproula, Man Pun Wanb, Benjamin H. Mandela and Arthur H. Rosenfeld developed a study that clearly explains the monetary benefits of reflective roofs v.s. Green Roofs v.s. traditional roofs. In their reductionist research, the outcome for green roof is not good. In a press release they stated:” The researchers acknowledge that their data are somewhat sparse but contend that their analysis is valuable in that it is the first to compare the economic costs and energy savings benefits of all three roof types.” It isn’t the first time – I have seen many worthless studies before…
    I am anchored in the Green Roof Industry since 1980, I roll my eyes and shake my head about counterproductive statements and studies like that. In the yellow pages they would have found somebody who could have told them differently and how to spend the generous money from the industry (other than green roof industry) much better – actually in building a green roof. Even when building a Green Roof doesn’t help the building owner (according their study) it would have helped the environment.
    Bringing back nature into a location where nature was before is simply the best you can do!
    My advice: Don’t start covering your green roofs or entire nature with a white piece of plastic – just don’t believe every written word on the internet or commercial reductionist research – Use your gut feeling and think out of the box!


  2. Louisa Hart

    For over a decade, The EPDM Roofing Association (ERA) has been the leading researching body and voice for manufacturers of both white and black EPDM single-ply roofing systems.

    Based on our concern that this study, released by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, is flawed, ERA assembled a team of experts to provide analysis of the study and detail its extreme shortcomings. Their analysis found that the LBL Researchers failed to follow certain scientific processes, and that the report frequently relied on anecdotal data, potentially biased or incomplete interpretations of data, and lacked quantitative sources of data. The complete analysis can be found at http://www.epdmroofs.org.

    Furthermore, ERA rejects the recommendation contained in the study that black roofing be banned in warmer climates. Due to the complexity of roof and building science, prescriptive requirements that limit choices available to the architectural and building owner community are not in the best interest of good roof system design. Our overriding concern is that building owners and their design professionals are provided with science-based, field-tested information to help them make the choice of a roofing system that will meet their needs. Additionally, ERA feels that it is imperative to defer any decision related to roof design to architects and/or roof consultants, who have the proper training and understanding of all of the components found within a roofing system.

  3. Joe Spica

    It seems to me that in central and northern climates where you spend more money on heating than cooling the use of a white roof would only serve to make my heating bills go up, consume more natural resources and therefore emit more CO2 making the global warming problem worse. I think the authors at LBNL need a reality check.

  4. Lisa Anderson

    The roof is one of the single most important components of any home. No part plays a bigger role in keeping the elements out, so when a roof requires repair, there’s little time to waste. Liquid roof RV Repair is a quick and final solution which does not let you be with any problem.

  5. Annette

    I live in Tasmania, Australia. Today we are expecting 34 degrees which is really hot. I have a White House and until
    recently it had a dark grey rusted roof. Power bills in the summer to make the house just liveable were astronomical. Last year I had a new colourbond roof installed, a white roof! My power bills have been slashed to less than half of what they were with the dark roof and my house is a cool house even on stinking hot days like today. I now hardly ever use the air conditioner and save loads of money.


Post Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *