Urbanization, Population Growth Fuel Waste-to-Energy Projects

Even though many businesses and municipal governments have policies requiring reductions in waste sent to landfills, about three-quarters of what humans throw away worldwide still winds up there.

In 2010, the US recycling rate inched up to 34.1%.

Unfortunately, instead of prioritizing waste reduction, recycling and composting, many landfill operators and communities are investing in thermal waste-to-energy projects that turn trash into fuel source. 

More than 800 plants have been built to convert municipal solid waste (MSW) into base load power and heat, and that number will grow rapidly over the next decade, predicts Pike Research.

The recycling industry is also responsible for millions of jobs, unlike waste-to-energy plants. 

Still, at least 261 million tons of MSW will be converted into energy each year by 2022, says Pike in its "Waste-to-Energy Technology Markets" report. And it could be as much as 400 million tons a year.

"Ten years from now the world’s rapidly increasing urban population will generate nearly 3 billion tons of MSW per year, representing an estimated 240 gigawatts of untapped energy potential," says senior research analyst Mackinnon Lawrence.

"The escalation in waste generation presents policy makers with a difficult choice: either expand existing landfill capacity (an unappealing, but low-cost option in many areas) or invest in new waste-to-energy capacity, which can reduce the overall volume of waste that must be dumped." 

China, known for its open-pit landfills, is reaching capacity quickly and is encouraging waste-to-energy plants by paying more for electricity generated from them than it does for coal-generated power.

Overall, the Asia Pacific region is expected to account for 54% of electricity generated from waste-to-energy systems worldwide.

Read our report on the Recycling Industry:

(Visited 5,188 times, 3 visits today)

Comments on “Urbanization, Population Growth Fuel Waste-to-Energy Projects”

  1. Jen

    WTE is toxic and wasteful, not sustainable.

    Recycling and composting along with better designed products and extended producer responsibility is sustainable.

    Reply
  2. George Adams

    @Jen — I agree. It’s time to stop the waste addiction and the subsequent greenhouse gas-intensive resource extraction for new stuff.

    Reply
  3. joe

    I saw the Koch backed climate scientist who has recently changed his denier status on Rachel Maddow last night, and he says that the only way to go is by clean fracking. I wonder if his conversion is a ruse. Is there such a thing as “clean” fracking? Or are the fossil fuel companies going pay the news media to support war and the consequent employment increase in weapon production instead of clean energy jobs.

    Reply
  4. Fidelis Onu

    You may not believe it, but I never saw recycling as a more sustainable option that WTE. We live & learn.
    I applaud the US for being proactive in responding to the issue of waste management. This is more than i can say for policy makers in my country ,Nigeria.
    I use this opportunity to solicit for technological solutions that would help Nigeria adequately address the growing environmental hazards we expose ourselves to daily here

    Reply
  5. Chris C

    How about an all of the above approach? Everyone wants to cut our dependence on foreign oil while at the same time many fight reasonable alternatives. Recycle as much as you can while embracing ever improving technologies. Even with 50% recycling there will be 50% waste. Clean WTE is a great option to be included in the mix.

    Reply

Post Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *