Intelligent Materials Pooling: Evolving a Profitable Technical Metabolism

By Michael Braungart
Fly Fishing
Intelligent Materials Pooling (IMP) is a collaborative, business-to-business approach to managing the industrial metabolism. Partners in an intelligent materials pool agree to share access to a common supply of a particular high-tech, high-quality material, pooling information and purchasing power to generate a healthy system of closed loop material flows. As partners share knowledge and resources, they develop a shared commitment to using the healthiest, highest quality materials in all of their products. Together they form a value-based business community focused on eliminating the concept of waste from manufacturing cycles. Ultimately, Intelligent Materials Pooling creates life support systems for sustainable business.

IMP is built on MBDC’s Cradle to Cradle Design(sm) Protocol, which recognizes materials as nutrients that cycle through either the biological metabolism or the technical metabolism. The biological metabolism is made up of natural processes that circulate the pool of materials or nutrientswater, oxygen, soil, CO2that support life on Earth. The technical metabolism, designed to mirror natural nutrient cycles, is a closed loop system in which valuable, high-tech synthetics and mineral resources circulate in an endless cycle of production, recovery and reuse. Following MBDC’s Protocol, companies are creating products and materials designed as biological or technical nutrients, which either safely biodegrade or provide high-quality resources for subsequent generations of products. While nature manages the cycles of the biological metabolism, an IMP is a nutrient management system for the technical metabolism.

Business-to-Business Support
The evolution of an intelligent materials pool follows the same steps as almost any kind of community or nation building: The community decides what it does not want; it chooses what it does want; its members support each other against those who endanger the community; a culture bound by shared values forms. The result: a life support system for sustainable commerce; a community supported by, and committed to, Cradle to Cradle Design.

From a business perspective, the process begins with an agreement to phase out a hazardous material, such as PVC, common to a number of companies. Out of this shared commitment to intelligent design comes a community of companies with the market strength to effectively engineer the phase-out and develop innovative alternative materials. Together, they specify for preferred materials, establish defined-use periods for products and services, and create an intelligent materials bank from which each partner deposits and withdraws. This business support system, built on cradle-to-cradle principles and embodied in the materials bank, gives companies the strength and know-how to make material flows management an ongoing harvest of assets rather than an endless exercise in managing liabilities.

Origins: A Materials Pooling Metaphor
Fly-fishing is a great way to get a visceral understanding of industrial material flows. I realized this while standing hip-deep in a cold Icelandic stream as my friend, colleague and fishing partner, Darcy Winslow, gently removed the hook from a salmon she had just caught and released it back into the pool. The fish wriggled on the surface for a moment, seemingly getting oriented, and then darted away, joining a dozen other healthy salmon at the bottom of the stream. Darcy handed me the fishing rod we were sharing. It was my turn now, and as I cast, I knew that if I were half as good at fly-fishing as Darcy, I had an equal chance of catching a fish; there were a dozen in the pool when we started and their were a dozen now. With support from my fishing partnertips on technique and choice of fly, where the fish were bitingmy chances were even better.

This is essentially how Intelligent Materials Pooling works. Like salmon, resources for high-quality technical materialsthe cadmium used in solar collectors, for exampleare rare and precious. To catch and eat salmon at will would likely end their time on Earth. The same is true for rare mineral resources; to use and discard them mortgages the future. But if materials are used in a system that echoes catch-and-release fishing, they can be used for a defined period and then returned to a common pool, providing technical resources for the next generation of high quality, high-tech products.

In a materials pool, multiple companies using a common, standardized ingredient, such as nylon, are creating a materials bank. As partners draw materials from the bank to create new products, they also replenish it with used products they have recovered and returned for recycling. An athletic shoe manufacturer, a furniture design firm, and a high-tech materials company might together create a nylon bank and a support system that gives them the market strength not only to profitably manage their common supply chain, but to be effective innovators as well. Creating a community of shared values gives the partners far more strength than they could ever have alone.

From Metaphor to Practical Vision
This is precisely what I discussed with Darcy Winslow as we navigated the riffles of that chilly Icelandic stream. Darcy (Director of Nike’s Women’s Footwear Division), along with Keith Winn (Herman Miller’s Advance Projects Program Manager at the time, and now principal of Catalyst Partners) and Ed Guerrini (BASF’s Director of Innovative Business Solutions), had joined my colleague Bill McDonough and me to spend some time relaxing together in the outdoors and talking about the future of manufacturing and commerce.

Imagine, I suggested, if Nike, Herman Miller, and BASF created a materials pool and shared access to high-quality nylon. Nike and Herman Miller would enjoy the cost savings generated by their ability to generate purchases in larger volumes than either company could generate alone, while BASF, the nylon manufacturer and bank, would be supported in its efforts to develop innovative, ecologically intelligent polymers. Nike and Herman Miller would also be able to depend on the high quality of the nylon circulating through the pool and use it for a variety of new purposes as they learned about its qualities. The more the material is used, the more information is gained and shared, which would optimize its processing, recovery and re-use. With mutual support, the companies could begin co-branding, creating a strong, shared identity built on a cradle-to-cradle vision of quality, which in turn would generate a strong and valuable market identity.

In this scenario, the information about the material becomes as important as the material itself, making the distinction between the old and new economy obsolete. BASF would in effect become a high-tech communications company, materializing information. That is, it would provide material intelligence as it gained technical information from processing and reprocessing a material over time. Rather than downcycling a material for use in a product of lesser value, BASF would be upcycling, adding value and information to a material as it cycled through the bank. Together, the companies could create an ecologically intelligent culture of innovation. They wouldn’t eat the fish; they’d share materials, information and success.

While Nike, BASF, and Herman Miller might benefit from our hypothetical nylon Intelligent Materials Pool, companies from a variety of manufacturing sectors could collaborate to create material banks for nearly every valuable commodity, from chemicals to ste
el to advanced polymers. To do so, the goal of materials pooling can be nothing less than eliminating the concept of waste.

To do so, technical materials like alloys, stabilizers and polymers must be designed to be used again and again. Intelligent materials make this possible. Some polymers, for instance, can be recycled more than 90 times without losing performance quality. Intelligently designed steel can be recycled endlessly.

Steps to Create Industrial Community

Phase 1: Creating Community

Identify shared values: Cradle to Cradle Design, eliminating the concept of waste
Identify willing industrial partners
Target specific toxic chemicals for replacement

Phase 2: Utilizing Market Strength
Share list of materials targeted for reduction and elimination
Develop a positive purchasing and procurement list of preferred intelligent chemicals

Phase 3: Defining Material Flows
Specify for and design with preferred materials
Define use periods for products and services
Create a materials bank
Design a technical metabolism for preferred materials

Phase 4: Ongoing Support
Create preferred business partner agreements among members
Share information gained from material use and research
Develop co-branding strategies
Support the mechanisms of the technical metabolism

Finding willing partners might be hard to imagine in the competitive world of business but it is hardly unprecedented. In the textile industry innovative mills like Victor Innovatex and Rohner Textil, along with MBDC and DesignTex, have profitably collaborated on the design and production of ecologically intelligent fabrics. In the textile and apparel industry at large, several companies we have worked with have expressed deep interest in joining together to create a “polyester coalition.” With the technology for truly recycling polyester in development, a polyester collective could begin to close the loop on the flow of this widely used industrial material.

An Intelligent Polyester Pool
Here’s how a polyester cooperative might work: Willing partners agree on their shared commitment to product quality. Though partners might represent different industries and perspectives, they would be bound by common values. As with all new communities, a polyester pool would have to develop a framework of governance to set up the standards and protocols of working together. One could imagine the process as a kind of nation building and the framework as a constitution that outlines the rights and responsibilities of all partners, which all would agree to in a spirit of mutual trust. This exercise in community building would lay the foundation for future work.

With common ground established, the coalition partners would begin to create a list of specific chemicals used in the manufacture of polyester that are widely known to be harmful. These would be targeted for elimination or replacement. Participating companies would then generate a list of preferred intelligent materials-the ingredients they would ultimately like to use to create an ecologically intelligent polyester. Victor Innovatex, with MBDC, has already developed such a material.

After developing common specifications for intelligent polyester, the members of the coalition would begin to specify it as a product ingredient. With the power of its pooled market, the coalition could approach a polyester producer and invite it to become a partner. Ideally, the producer would be equipped with a chemical recycling system, which would effectively allow it to become the polyester bank. The coalition would agree to purchase all its polyester from the producer and the producer would agree to manufacture intelligent polyester and take back and recycle all the materials the coalition returned. The companies would define the use periods for their products and individually set up take-back programs to replenish the material bank. A polyester loop would be effectively closed, eliminating waste from the technical metabolism of the coalition.

This process could be widely applied. In the steel industry, for example, value is often lost when a range of grades are mixed in recycling. A materials pool could preserve the value of steel over many life-cycles by specifying the separation of different grades in the technical metabolism. When high-quality steel is recycled with high-quality steel the metal retains its structural integrity. With cooperation between steel-makers and the manufacturers of a wide variety of products, from automobiles to trains to refrigerators, the steel loop could begin to be closed and the value of its nutrients preserved over time.

Seeding Material Pools
Following the outlines of our product of service concept, some companies have begun to develop material pools by selling the service a product provides rather than the product itself. Carpet companies, for example, lease to their customers the service of floor covering. When the carpet wears out, or the customer decides to try a new style, the manufacturer retrieves the carpet and its materials are reused in new carpets. This strategy can be applied to any product: Car makers can provide the service of mobility; washing machine manufacturers can provide the service of clean clothes; computer distributors can provide the service of information and instant contact with the world, and so on.

Providing a service rather than a product has many benefits. First, it seeds the development of material pools. Companies maintain ownership of their materials while profiting from the services they offer. When the product is returned, its ingredients, if intelligently designed, can be used again in new products. Designing for recovery and reuse also gives companies the opportunity to specify high-quality materials – they will never lose their investment – and to design products with built in flexibility. Products designed for disassembly, for example, might contain high-tech parts that can be easily re-used in the next generation of evolving high-tech machinery. All of this, of course, results in the intelligent and effective use of valuable materials.

A Promising Future
Products of service are already a part of the industrial landscape, seeding material pools in evolving industries. Hints of business-to-business cooperation are also emerging as innovative companies explore the future of intelligent materials. There are, perhaps, many success stories on the horizon. To be truly successful on a large scale, however, material banks will have to be adopted throughout industry.

Closing the loop on material flows is the key to intelligent design and regenerative commerce. When industrial systems accrue value with healthy products, we can all celebrate human productivity and ingenuity rather than lamenting our impact on the world. As we move toward this goal with positive aspirations, modeling industry on the elegant designs of the natural world, we can begin to create the intelligent products and intelligent support systems that will allow both business and nature to thrive and grow. In such a world, where salmon are healthy and their habitats plentiful, we could enjoy the enduring health of the salmon species and have one for lunch, too.

++++

Michael Braungart is a principle in the firm, McDonough Braungart Design Chemistry.
The product and process design firm is dedicated to transforming the design of products, processes, and services worldwide. The firm was founded in 1995 by William McDonough and Michael Braungart to promote and power “the Next Industrial Revolution” through intelligent design.


Excerpted from the September/October Feature article at the MBDC website, a SustainableBusiness.com Content Partner.

(Visited 187 times, 121 visits today)

Post Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *