Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Facebook View our linked in profile View our RSS feeds
SustainableBusiness.com
 
News
Your daily source for sustainable business & sustainable investor news.

(view sample issue)

11/11/2010 05:44 PM     print story email story         Page: 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  

Election Fall-Out for Clean Technology

Page 2

California voters overwhelmingly repudiated big oil's attempt to scrap the state's landmark global warming law, AB32. The cleantech industry's first all-out campaign prevailed against corporate interference and proved that voters want something done about climate change. In a state with the country's third highest unemployment rate, voters think renewable energy creates jobs, not destroys them. The cleantech community raised three times the funds as did the polluters, which led to the resounding rejection of Proposition 23.

The victory lays the groundwork for clean energy advances in other states and eventually at the federal level as it represents the largest public referendum in history on clean energy and climate policy.

The victory is bittersweet, however, because voters passed Prop 23's evil twin, Prop 26, which would de-fund AB32 along with all polluter fees that aren't passed with a two-thirds majority vote. Read the NY Times article.

When the California Air Resources Board launches its cap-and-trade program in 2012, they are planning to give most of the permits away for free, against the advice of an expert panel and the EU's experience in implementing their program. Oil refiners and other polluters lobbied the agency to auction only a "very small" number of permits when the program starts because of the same old line: it would impose unnecessary short-term costs.

What to Expect Going Forward

Much of the focus going forward will be pushing the Obama Administration and Congress to use the Clean Air Act to cut greenhouse gases and jump start investments in clean energy, and to support strong climate financing at the upcoming United Nations climate talks in Cancún.

Cap-and-Trade will have to be accomplished slowly and deliberately by cobbling together states and regions. Major environmental NGOs say their focus for 2011 will be on forming more state-led initiatives like the Western Climate Initiative.

Passage of California's AB32 could pave the way for a cap-and-trade system that would cover most of the U.S. West and the largest Canadian provinces. Add to that the existing 10-state Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) on the East coast, and a proposed Midwestern Greenhouse Gas Reduction Accord (MGGRA), and the majority of the U.S. would be covered.

On the federal level, Republicans will require it be their way or the highway. Democrats will have to give huge handouts for nuclear and fossil fuels in order to make any gains for renewable energy; that didn't work in the last Congress, so it's doubtful much headway will be made in the next. Rather, the administration will rely on the EPA, DOE and other relevant agencies to get the job done.  Those agencies will be subject to very unfriendly congressional oversight as well as attempts to de-fund initiatives and block their work through the courts.

« back   next »

Reader Comments (3)

Author:
Jim Gleeson, AIA

Date Posted:
11/10/10 01:16 PM

Rona and Sustainable Business, I have been in the "Sustainable Design" Business for many years. I have seen the industry go from an almost unknown movement of architects, engineers and others trying to start the USGBC, to steady growth, as people became aware of the benefits of 'green' strategies to the triple bottom line. Somewhere in the early 2000's something started to take over the movement. It started to grow exponentially. This was very rewarding at first to those of us that had worked hard from early on to promote it and it's benefits. But something had changed. It had become POLITICAL. It had been taken over by people with a different agenda, one not so much about the environment. I am very much interested in, and supportive of environmental issues. The waste that our building and manufacturing, even living processes produce is appalling. But how did we get from there to government control, carbon taxation and wealth redistribution and UN Frameworks on Global Government? When you say things like "Lie, Smear, Obstruct, Win. That's the new motto for American politics." referring to Republicans, you only add to the polarization. It is not just black and white. The US is a prime example of how free enterprise cleans up is own messes as it and technology develop. For example, automobiles give off a small fraction of the GHG they did only a few years ago. MPG has tripled since the seventies. When government takes too much control it only slows things down and produces the kind of national debt we are currently experiencing. For a website named "Sustainable Business" the anti-business rhetoric is extremely counter productive.

Author:
Rona Fried

Date Posted:
11/10/10 08:09 PM

Jim, this isn't anti-business rhetoric. The Lie, Smear, Obstruct, Win line refers to things like "cap and tax", which effectively ended our ability to install a cap-and-trade program, "death panels", which turned the American public away from health care reform, etc. Unfortunately, the EIA has produced reports over the past years saying that there must be a price on carbon, that government policy is crucial in leveling the playing field for renewable energy. And until this year, when Obama finally put new fuel economy standards in force, the US hadn't increased those standards since the 1970s or 1980s. Many of the biggest corporations such as GE, Google etc. are very much in favor of proactive gov't policy.

Author:
Jim Gleeson, AIA

Date Posted:
10/09/11 02:46 AM

Rona, I'm not saying we don't need a plan to get to renewable energy and away from reliance on foreign oil. I'm saying we have to have a long range plan designed by all the major players that is consistent with how our economy works. If we have to switch to a government induced forced- march which ignores economics, to get there, we will never get there. If the government in the 1890's had put huge taxes on the horse and buggy industry to promote the automobile they would have put thousands of people out of work and crippled and industry well before the automobile was ready for mass consumption. I am very much a proponent for Green Energy, but government can't force green energy to be feasible especially when we are already 14 Trillion in debt. You use "Lie Smear Obstruct, win" to describe calling "Cap and Trade", "Cap and Tax". Those of us in the "Green Industry" must be very careful we are not promoting something based on unresearched assumptions. You are assuming that the "science" on which Cap and Trade is based is actually true and verifiable. I assumed it was also, until I did my own research. Have you actually read the UN IPCC reports and the reports by Richard Lindzen of MIT and many others? The real unfortunate thing to me is that now the original, authentic Green movement is caught between both world views- we have been hijacked by the left and now the right assumes we (green architects, journalists etc.)are all part of the push for government control. Please describe for us how the government can actually "level the playing field" and make solar or wind energy affordable and practical on an national scale. When you give them millions of taxpayer dollars that doesn't make them successful, it produces things like Solyndra. It's a nice idea if it were actually doable. Too many people and organizations are abdicating their responsibility to understand fully what they are promoting and instead are just accepting the talking points of those pushing an agenda and passing it on as unquestionable. www.thegwpf.org

Add Your Comment

(Use any name, your real name is not required)
Type the characters you see in the picture below.

home |about us |contact us |advertise |feeds |privacy policy |disclosure

Compare Green Cars   |   Find Alternative Fueling Stations