Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Facebook View our linked in profile View our RSS feeds
SustainableBusiness.com
 
News
Your daily source for sustainable business & sustainable investor news.

(view sample issue)


This is an archived story. The information and any links may no longer be accurate.

05/23/2013 12:52 PM     print story email story  

Los Angeles Votes to Overturn Citizens United

SustainableBusiness.com News

As part of a city-wide election in Los Angeles, voters in the second-largest US city passed a referendum to overturn Citizens United using a constitutional amendment.

76.6% of voters favored Proposition C, which would overturn the 2010 Supreme Court decision and limit the rights of corporations to spend money on elections. The resolution also requires Los Angeles lawmakers and area representatives to actively push for a constitutional amendment on the state and federal levels.

Citizens United

Los Angeles joins over 400 jurisdictions including 175 cities, such as San Francisco, Chicago and Boston, that have passed similar resolutions, along with 13 states: Maryland, New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Vermont, Maine, West Virginia, New Mexico, Colorado, MontanaCalifornia and Hawaii. 

Amending the constitution requires passage by two thirds of each chamber of Congress, and then ratification by three quarters of the states.  That means 67 Senators and 290 House Representatives have to sign on.  

"The people are speaking here - at the ballot box and through their elected representatives. The overwhelming majorities supporting an amendment in every jurisdiction where it has come to a vote should send a powerful signal to Washington and every state capitol," says  Karen Hobert Flynn, senior vice president for strategy and programs for Common Cause, which is spearheading the drive to overturn Citizens United.

In Citizens United and other decisions, the Supreme Court in recent years has removed longstanding bans or limits on political spending by corporations, trade associations, labor unions and wealthy individuals. More than $1 billion in "independent expenditures" from such donors went into the 2012 races for president, Congress and state offices, much of it without disclosure of the actual sources of the money.

24 Senators and 73 House Reps have introduced or co-sponsored amendment bills.  The 78-member Congressional Progressive Caucus voted unanimously in support of a constitutional amendment.

2 million signatures were delivered to the Senate last July calling for Congress to overturn Citizens United and related cases by amending the Constitution.



Reader Comments (2)

Author:
jude folly

Date Posted:
05/23/13 05:52 PM

Let's assume that the Citizens United decision is overturned by constitutional amendment--as it should be--what then? Wealthy donors will still be able to buy influence. What is an. average voter's recourse? Take the 2016 presidential race. Already loads of cash are channeling towards Hillary Clinton's candidacy for president in 2016. As an individual voter you have no leverage with a candidate for public office--not unless you join other voters to demand campaign finance accountability. Your chance to be heard and have a place at the table is here. Please sign up @ http://pac.petitions.moveon.org/sign/hillary-in-16-pac-political

Report this post

Author:
Pragmatic idealist

Date Posted:
05/24/13 05:52 PM

Jude has it right. The only real way to give power back to the people (politician's and Wall Street's worst nightmare) is to have strict, low limits on all campaign spending, preferably government funded.

Report this post

Add Your Comment

(Use any name, your real name is not required)
Type the characters you see in the picture below.

home |about us |contact us |advertise |feeds |privacy policy |disclosure

Compare Green Cars   |   Find Alternative Fueling Stations