Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Facebook View our linked in profile View our RSS feeds
SustainableBusiness.com
 
News
Your daily source for sustainable business & sustainable investor news.

(view sample issue)


This is an archived story. The information and any links may no longer be accurate.

05/15/2009 10:13 AM     print story email story  

First Ocean Acidification Suit Filed Against EPA

SustainableBusiness.com News

The nonprofit Center for Biological Diversity yesterday filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) over the agency’s failure to recognize the impacts of ocean acidification on waters off the state of Washington.

The suit, brought under the Clean Water Act, is the first to address ocean acidification, sometimes called--along with global warming--“the other carbon dioxide problem.”

The oceans readily absorb CO2 emissions from power plants and other human activities. In turn, the CO2 causes seawater to become more acidic, lowering its pH. This process, known as ocean acidification, impairs the ability of marine animals to build the protective shells and skeletons they need to survive. Studies have found that ocean acidification hurts nearly every marine animal with a shell, including oysters, urchins, sea stars, and crabs. Notably, it also weakens and dissolves the thin shells of certain plankton that form the base of the marine food web.

“Ocean acidification is global warming’s evil twin,” said Miyoko Sakashita, an attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity’s oceans program. “The EPA has a duty under the Clean Water Act to protect our nation’s waters from pollution, and today, CO2 is one of the biggest threats to our ocean waters.”

The federal Clean Water Act requires states to identify impaired waters, those water bodies failing to meet water-quality standards. The Act also requires the EPA to oversee the state’s impaired waters list, approve or disapprove state-submitted lists, and add any waters failing to attain water-quality standards to the impaired list when those waters are omitted by a state.

Scientists monitoring waters off the coast of Washington reported that ocean acidification is already affecting seawater quality and marine ecosystems. According to the 2008 report in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, since 2000 the pH of Washington’s coastal waters has declined by more than 0.2 units, violating the state’s water-quality standard for pH.

In August 2007, the Center for Biological Diversity formally requested that Washington list its ocean waters as impaired due to the impacts of ocean acidification. In late 2008, Washington submitted a deficient list of impaired waters to EPA that failed to include ocean waters degraded by ocean acidification. The Center informed EPA of its duty to add ocean waters not attaining pH standards when reviewing Washington’s impaired waters list. On January 29, 2009, EPA approved Washington’s list without adding ocean waters affected by ocean acidification.

“Ocean acidification is not some distant threat that can be shunted off to future decision-makers; it has already arrived, and we have to acknowledge and deal with the problem right now,” added Sakashita. “EPA has all the evidence it needs to act to begin protecting our waters from ocean acidification. Further delay is simply not justified.”

Once a water body is listed as impaired, the EPA or state must set limits on the input of pollutants into these bodies of water to prevent further degradation. In this case, the Clean Water Act would require limits on CO2 emissions that contribute to ocean acidification.

“We already have the legal tools we need to limit ocean acidification,” said Sakashita. “The Clean Water Act is the nation’s strongest law protecting water quality, and it is very good at its job, which is to stop water pollution.”

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Seattle, seeks to compel EPA to amend Washington’s impaired waters list to include any ocean waters that are failing to attain water-quality standards as a result of ocean acidification. The Center is represented in the suit by Crag Law Center.

Last month, in response to a Center petition, EPA began a public process as to whether its water-quality criteria should be updated to reflect the impacts of ocean acidification. Current EPA criteria, adopted by most states, require a finding of impairment if waters deviate more than 0.2 pH units from natural variation. This standard, adopted in 1976 before ocean acidification was recognized as a threat, is likely inadequate. Nevertheless, ocean acidification is occurring so rapidly on the U.S. West Coast that Washington’s waters already exceed this standard, the Center said.

Website: www.biologicaldiversity.org



Reader Comments (1)

Author:
Noah Pollock

Date Posted:
05/16/09 06:41 PM

The acidification of our oceans is one of the more troublesome impacts of increasing atmospheric concentrations of CO2. Anyone who has witnessed the beauty of coral reefs can provide testament to the magic of such places, and what a travesty their destruction would be. As they teach in summer and online course in ecological economics at the University of Vermont's Institute for Global Sustainability (http://learn.uvm.edu/igs)- which explores the interrelationships between ecological and economic systems- coral reefs provide the vital "ecosystem service" of providing habitat for many other fish species during their first years. It will be interesting to hear how EPA's effort - and others like it (for example, those focused on polar bears) is successful. For preventing CO2 from being absorbed into the oceans is an global effort requiring global regulations.

Report this post

Add Your Comment

(Use any name, your real name is not required)
Type the characters you see in the picture below.

home |about us |contact us |advertise |feeds |privacy policy |disclosure

Compare Green Cars   |   Find Alternative Fueling Stations