|
04/26/2002 09:16 PM
|
|
|
Page: 1 | 2
|
The State of Environment & Business
Page 2
Energy
By the end of 1999, almost a quarter of U.S. citizens will be able to purchase "green power." People are signing up in record numbers for renewable electricity blends offered by early mover companies like Green Mountain Inc. Eight states have instated 'portfolio energy standards' that require suppliers to use a minimum percentage of renewable energy and disclose their energy sources to customers.
In less than a year, 100,000 customers in both Pennsylvania and California have opted for clean energy and power marketers are already shifting their strategy from selling the cheapest electricity to the greenest blend possible. Commonwealth Energy Corporation, California's largest supplier and one of its cheapest energy providers, is converting its 38,000 residential and small business customers to its GreenSmart program using local, renewable energy sources. Unlike most green power programs, which require people to pay a premium, Commonwealth will provide green energy at a discounted rate. Patagonia, Toyota, the City of Santa Monica, New Belgium Brewing and about nine churches are fueling the green power bandwagon, enabling the installation of new solar, wind, geothermal, biomass and landfill gas capacity.
20 years from now, the Energy Information Administration predicts renewable energy will account for 10 percent of energy use in the U.S.[1] Coal and oil use creeps along increasing at about 1 percent annually, while solar cell sales expand by 15 percent per year, jumping 40 percent in 1997. Solar shingles, a new development, integrate solar cells into a building's roof and have the potential to revolutionize electricity generation worldwide.
Wind energy, racking up 26 percent annual increases over the last eight years, now competes with fossil fuel prices. Experts predict it will be cheaper than fossil fuel within 10 years thanks to lower turbine prices, higher efficiency and availability. The U.S. Department of Energy's Wind Resource Inventory shows that North Dakota, South Dakota, and Texas alone can meet U.S. electricity needs with wind energy. Hundreds of new high-tech windmills dot the Midwest landscape, dubbed the Saudia Arabia of wind.
Meanwhile, EU country wind investments are growing even more rapidly at 40 percent annually in Germany, Denmark, Spain, and UK. EU power sector emissions can be reduced by over 11 percent by 2040 using wind power. Costa Rica is committed to generating 100 percent of its electricity from renewable sources by 2010. Denmark no longer allows new coal power plant construction.
Forest Products
In only two years since the first forest certification body was accredited, more than 10 million hectares of forest are certified to meet the Forest Stewardship Council's (FSC) criteria, equal to 115 forests in 25 countries. The World Wildlife Fund's new target is for 25 million hectares to be certified by 2001. In the U.S., the certifier Scientific Certification Systems reports that requests for chain-of-custody certification have tripled in the last year. Two years ago, according to Debbie Hammel, program director, there was more supply than demand for certified products. "Now the situation is reversed and demand is easily outstripping supply."
Due to deforestation and protection efforts, the area available for timber production is shrinking. China banned timber production in its forests in 1998 acknowledging that deforestation greatly exacerbated its recent record-breaking floods. The country is employing some state timber firms for tree-planting instead. Beijing's official stand is that standing trees are worth three times more than cut trees, because of the water storage and flood retention services forests provide. Many countries, including Brazil, Cambodia, U.S., New Zealand, Sri Lanka and Thailand, banned or imposed strict logging restrictions in primary forests during the last year.
PricewaterhouseCoopers, an accounting firm, predicts after-tax losses of C$1 billion (US $1.5 billion) for the British Columbia forestry industry. Their advice to the industry is to implement sustainable certification or lose markets. As a result of an intensive Greenpeace campaign, MacMillan Bloedel, the largest British Columbia timber company, agreed to cease clear-cutting and apply for certification, and withdrew from the BC forest industry association. Home Depot, the largest purchaser of forest products, is under similar pressure to redirect its purchases to sustainable harvested timber.
Svetogorsk, a major pulp and paper mill in Russia, is completely phasing out ancient forest wood in its production. Meyer International, the UK's largest timber trader pledged that 80 percent of its timber would be FSC-certified within five years. Meyer sources timber from 40 countries. According to Amanda Burton of Meyer, the firm has "always kept a close eye on the development of certification and now, as FSC is entering the mainstream we can see it presents an exciting commercial opportunity."
27 large U.S. corporations, accounting for over one billion dollars of the annual U.S. market for paper, pulp, and packaging have made a commitment to stop selling products or use packaging made from old-growth trees, and to influence their suppliers to do the same. They also committed to reduce overall wood-related product consumption and to increase use of recycled and tree-free alternatives (See Figure 3). To meet this demand there are over 3000 products fashioned from certified wood available.
Companies Committed to Sustainable Forestry Products
| | 3M Corporation | Advanced Micro Devices Inc. | | Bristol Myers Squibb | Dell Computer Corp. | | Estee Lauder | Hallmark Card | | Hewlett-Packard | IBM Corporation | | Johnson & Johnson | Kinko's, Inc. | | Levi Strauss & Co. | Liz Claiborne | | Lockheed Martin | McGraw Hill | | Mitsubishi Electric of America | Mitsubishi Motors Sales | | Mother Jones Magazine | Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co. | | National Geographic Magazine | NIKE, Inc. | | Pacific Gas & Electric | Patagonia | | Quantum Corporation | Seventh Generation | | Starbucks Coffee Company | United Stationers Supply | | Utne Reader |
|
Capital Markets
Influencing the financial community's investment, lending, and insurance decisions is a relatively new focus for sustainability efforts. Private groups, rather than world governments are behind much of international development, especially as the World Bank and similar groups increasingly partner with private banks. Between 1990-1996, capital from private institutions to developing countries increased from 44 - 86 percent, according to the World Bank.
Banking industry leaders increasingly perform environmental due diligence in decisions to extend credit lines, finance projects or equipment. Over half the respondents to a recent National Wildlife Federation world banking survey expect to intensify this focus over the next three years (three-quarters of European banks). In the future, "eco-rating" systems or screens may well be applied to equity investments.
While virtually no one targeted the environmental industry for investment two years ago, two thirds of respondents now direct some credit or investment in the industry; some institutions have environmental business units. Nearly every responding institution expects to increase this activity over the next three years.[2]
BankAmerica's Corporate Environmental Report portends future bank policy. In it, the bank discusses its credit policy and how environmental issues affect its decisions regarding specific transactions such as its controversial bond issue for the Three Gorges Dam in China.
Socially screened mutual funds are an established investing sector and are offered by many fund managers from Dreyfus to Smith Barney. Rather than screening out companies social investors want to avoid the emphasis is shifting toward a more proactive approach - investing in environmental and social leading companies. A recent flurry of quantitative studies demonstrates that beyond compliance corporate environmental investments increase financial performance and thus, shareholder value. [3] Firms, which implement systemic measures - such as organizational change initiatives and product redesign - show the most benefit.
Ecos Consulting Group surveyed the environmental performance of the top 150 companies on the Australian Stock Exchange. A "best of sector" portfolio of environmental leaders out-performed the Australian All Ordinaries Index by four percent from 1992 - 1998. Comparisons have been made for U.S. and Canadian companies, with similar results. Mutual funds are emerging to tap into the enhanced performance: Triodos Bank launched a fund in the UK and the Netherlands which invests in wind energy projects; the Storebrand-Scudder Environmental Value Fund, SBC Eco Performance Portfolio, and Swedbank's Environmental Fund invest in companies based on eco-efficiency assessments and have shown dramatic performance gains over their counterparts.
Innovest Strategic Value Advisors, a New York- and Toronto-based environmental rating agency for the financial and investment communities says reason environmental indicators work is that "environmental performance can invariably be used as a strong, empirically demonstrable proxy for the quality of corporate management, which, in turn, is a primary determinate of relative financial performance." Innovest's eco-efficiency rating tool, EcoValue 21, uses more than 60 company- and industry-specific criteria to link eco-efficiency with profitability.
Corporate Environmental Reports
Financial reporting was unreliable until the Securities and Exchange Commission required a standard format. 10 years from now, corporate environmental reporting may be accepted much in the same way. The debate has shifted from whether companies should produce corporate environmental reports to what kinds of information should be released and in which format. A growing list of stakeholders, each framing questions from their unique perspective - customers, governments, NGOs, communities, and the financial/investment sector - demand sustainable performance information. This presents a significant reporting burden for a company, especially if it has global operations. Without a standard reporting format performance across companies cannot be compared.
Several European countries, including Denmark and the Netherlands, have adopted, or are in the process of adopting, laws that require companies over a certain size to publish environmental reports. The Netherlands, for example, is developing an Energy Efficiency covenant with energy-intensive companies. If a company can demonstrate superior performance for their industry sector through international benchmarking they avoid additional energy efficiency requirements. [4]
To meet the need for standard, reliable information, leading companies around the world are participating in the Global Reporting Initiative, the goal of which is to develop generally accepted "sustainability" disclosure guidelines. Environmental guidelines will be cemented first, to be closely followed by social guidelines. Draft guidelines have been issued and will be tested by 20 multinational companies.
The guidelines will have multiple positive effects:
- Companies will be able to produce one report for all stakeholders around the world.
- By conforming to a format all stakeholders agree on, the information will be much more usable and valuable.
- Governments can track progress on implementing national commitments to international conventions, such as the Kyoto Protocol.
- Corporate leaders will be able to tangibly distinguish themselves from under-performing competitors.
- Companies will have a useful system to track performance internally.
- Investors will be able to analyze corporate environmental performance.
Where Companies Are on the Sustainability Path
Two recent surveys of corporate executives, one by Business for Social Responsibility (BSR) and another by Arthur D. Little (ADL), provide a snapshot of the status of corporate environmental activities. [5] Sustainable development, according to the ADL survey, "refers to the global push for companies to build their long-term business strategies around three interconnected goals: economic growth, environmental excellence, and social responsibility."
Executives in both surveys revealed they realize the value of sustainability initiatives; 83 percent of respondents to the ADL survey agreed that "companies can develop real business value and economic growth from sustainable development initiatives." Although most companies use the term "sustainability" to describe their efforts, activities currently center on environmental rather than social issues, and continue to focus on eco-efficiency efforts such as energy efficiency, pollution prevention, and environmental audits. Companies are extending their reach throughout their supply chain and customer chain.
About 13 percent of American companies, and 22 percent of European companies polled in the ADL survey are well along the road in implementing advanced sustainability concepts like design-for-environment, closed-loop manufacturing systems, and full-cost accounting.
A very promising development noted in the BSR survey is a new attitude of openness and willingness to collaborate between companies and stakeholders. Unlikely partnerships are springing up between former adversaries as they see the need to work together as stakeholders with common concerns.
In Conclusion
The corporate world is on the path to sustainability. As it learns to integrate eco-efficiency measures into core operations and philosophy, it sets the stage for dramatically reducing the quantity of materials used in production, product take-back and reuse, and the dematerialization of products, the next steps in the Environmental Revolution. Financial and policy market incentives are emerging as drivers toward that end.
Today, companies are assimilating and experimenting with the new guidelines, reflected in the "2-faces" of corporate behavior. BP enters the solar market on the one hand, and pressures the U.S. Congress to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling on the other. The new Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers with Ford at the helm, forms to lobby against on safety and environmental issues, while they promote clean vehicles. As corporations experience success in burgeoning environmental markets and engage further and further in sustainable practices their behavior will be more consistent.
In the coming century, the transition to sustainability will change the types of businesses that exist and the products they produce. The way we structure and manage our economy will be fundamentally different. Sustainability is, in commercial terms, a business driver of immense significance.
Rona Fried, Ph.D., is president of Sustainable Business.com, the center for environment and business on the Internet. Contact her: rona@sustainablebusiness.com
|
Footnotes.
1. "Hydroelectricity and Other Renewable Resources": http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo98/hydro.html
2. "Environmental Policies & Practices of the Financial Services Industry: A Global Survey on the Private Sector," NWF Finance & Environment Program, 1997.
3. Reed, Donald, "Green Shareholder Value, Hype or Hit?" World Resources Institute, September 1998.
Descano, Linda & Gentry, Bradford, "Communicating Environmental Performance to the Capital Markets," Corporate Environmental Strategy: The Journal of Environmental Leadership, Spring 1998.
Russo, Michael & Fouts, Paul, "A Resource-Based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance & Profitability," Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 1997.
"Uncovering Value: Integrating Environmental and Financial Performance," Aspen Institute, 1999.
Feldman, S., Soyka, P, Ameer, P., "Does Improving a Firm's Environmental Management System & Environmental Performance Result in a Higher Stock Price?" ICF Kaiser International, November, 1996.
Porter, M., "Green and Competitive", Harvard Business Review, September-October, 1995. 120-34.
4. Energy Efficiency Benchmarking covenant, Dutch Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, November 1998.
5. "Sustainable Development and Business Survey," Arthur D. Little, 1998. "Moving Toward Sustainability: A View of Leadership Company Practices and Stakeholder Expectations," Business for Social Responsibility Education Fund, 1998.
« back
|
|