Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Facebook View our linked in profile View our RSS feeds
SustainableBusiness.com
 
News
Your daily source for sustainable business & sustainable investor news.

(view sample issue)

05/13/2010 11:49 AM     print story email story         Page: 1  | 2  

Time to Get Un-Addicted to Oil

Page 1

Update May 7: In a high stakes move, Senators John Kerry (D-MA) and Joe Lieberman (I-CT)  announced they will introduce the Energy Bill next week. They should use the momentum of the oil spill to remove oil drilling from the bill, but it's still in. The package includes generous revenue shares for coastal states that allow it. 

By Rona Fried, Ph.D.

As someone that's been involved in green business for decades, I've heard all the arguments over the years for continuing along the fossil fuel path of least resistance.

Back in the 1970s, after the oil embargo, President Carter put the US on a path toward energy efficiency and renewable energy, but that was quickly disassembled as soon as President Reagan took office. One of the first things Reagan did was remove the solar panels on the White House.

The theme during the President Bush Senior years was Economy VS. Environment - he insisted we could have one or the other, but not both. We made some limited progress while President Clinton was in office with Al Gore by his side, but even then Congress wouldn't sign the Kyoto Protocol.

Then came President GW Bush - it was during his term that climate science became indisputable; in one of his State of the Union addresses he forced himself to utter the words, "The US is addicted to oil" Still, he removed all the regulations he could - one reason we're seeing the devastating oil spill in the Gulf.

We remain addicted to oil, and like all addictions, we have the choice of allowing it to ruin our "body ecosystem" or get off the addiction.

What would be our situation today if we had invested in a clean energy economy since the 1970s? 40 years have passed with much talk and very little action ... except on-going support for fossil fuels. 

Why do we continue to put our economy and environment at risk - which our current President understands work hand in glove?

All the hoopla about "Drill, Baby, Drill", ignores some crucial facts. First, even if we drilled everywhere possible offshore, that oil would supply a mere 2% of US demand. Second, drilling for homegrown oil doesn't increase our energy independence because the oil is sold on the world markets, not just to the US. Third, oil drilling increases US greenhouse gas emissions, which we can no longer afford to do.

While the path of least resistance continues to be climate change denial, it's easy to observe the impacts. When will we connect the dots? Nashville, Tennessee is under water - they received a half year's rain in just two days this week! In Georgia, after an unusually dry spring, they were pounded with six inches of rain in several hours. The Washington DC area was pummeled by unprecedented amounts of snow this winter and the Midwest saw historic floods. The permafrost in Alaska is melting and entire forests are falling into the water as methane escapes into the atmosphere. Wildfires in the West now occur year-round, glaciers melting worldwide, invasive insects destroying millions of acres of forests, what more evidence does it take?

At some point, denial must give way to survival instincts. The only sure-fire way to prevent tragedies like the BP Deepwater Disaster is to re-enact the offshore drilling moratorium and to replace dirty dangerous fossil fuels with clean energy.

 next »

Reader Comments (3)

Author:
Solar Fred

Date Posted:
05/05/10 04:38 PM

Rona, you took the words right out of our collective solar mouths. The White House, the green washing. This is why Free Hot Water, a solar hot water company, is part of a coalition of 17 solar companies and solar professionals who offered FREE solar to the White House for Earth Day. So far, no response. You can read more about the reasoning behind this initiative in our blog post: http://www.freehotwater.com/blog/free-hot-water-offers-free-solar-hot-water-system-to-the-white-house-and-we-mean-it/ Obama and the White House need to lead by example. The only thing good about these recent coal and oil disasters is that it brings awareness to the fact that there are viable alternatives now with wind and solar. Thanks for your great thoughts here.

Author:
Rich from NJ

Date Posted:
05/07/10 08:00 PM

Rona: An excellent editorial all the way through. Good members of Congress should point out countries that are already making the transition to clean sources (such as Germany and Denmark?) and pressure Obama not to expand oil, coal, or nuclear--especially dangerous projects such as offshore drilling that could devastate vast ecosystems and multibillion-dollar fishing, tourism, and other industries (for those who care more about jobs than about wildlife). Fossil fuels should be only transitional resources, only where the environment's already been devastated, and not where an accident could create a long-lasting catastrophe. As articles in the New York Times in just the last couple of days make clear, we can't rely on offshore drilling when the minimally regulated industry has gotten away with no reliable backup systems for prevention or rapid cleanup of major accidents--just as we can't rely on more nuclear plants when they remain vulnerable to terrorist attack as well as accidents; an employee who worked at five different plants went over to Al Qaeda and could help prepare an attack on the cooling systems that prevent a catastrophic meltdown. Enough of reliance on these ultra-dangerous systems, when a "Manhattan project" of retrofitting buildings for energy efficiency and building wind and solar systems and a new national power grid would be far better, despite the initial costs. It's time for our side to get mad and start having rallies, writing letters to the editor, and lobbying members of Congress.

Author:
George Harvey

Date Posted:
05/10/10 10:33 PM

To Rona Fried, Please take a look at this report That I sent to the DOE, /Users/georgeharvey/Desktop/Modernization of an 1890s Wind-powered Hydrogen Economy For Our Present and Future Needs 7-10-09.pdf

Add Your Comment

(Use any name, your real name is not required)
Type the characters you see in the picture below.

home |about us |contact us |advertise |feeds |privacy policy |disclosure

Compare Green Cars   |   Find Alternative Fueling Stations