Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Facebook View our linked in profile View our RSS feeds
SustainableBusiness.com
 
News
Your daily source for sustainable business & sustainable investor news.

(view sample issue)

04/21/2009 06:29 PM     print story email story         Page: 1  | 2  

Energy Bill: Can it Pass?

Page 1

The most comprehensive, progressive Energy & Climate Bills we've ever seen in this country have begun the process of winding through the House and Senate. This could be the most difficult part of Obama's plan to gain passage and will need strong advocacy from the green business community.   

In the House, the Energy and Commerce Committee released a discussion draft of "The American Clean Energy and Security Act."  Committee Chair Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) and Edward Markey (D-Mass.), who chairs the Energy and Environment Subcommittee, are co-sponsors. Waxman says he hopes to pass the measure out of committee by Memorial Day.

In the Senate, the Energy & Natural Resources Committee has held 13 hearings and 30 staff briefings on provisions that would be contained in a bill. They hope to complete a bill by the end of April.

House Legislation

The House legislation has four components: clean energy, including renewable energy and carbon capture and sequestration; energy efficiency; climate change cap-and-trade program; and provisions to protect citizens from price spikes while promoting green jobs.

The bill's highlights are:

-  Reduce GHG emissions 20% from 2005 levels by 2020. This is the first bill to embrace science-based GHG emissions reduction targets set by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). To limit warming to 2 degrees, developed nations must cut emissions 25-40% below 1990 levels by 2020 and 80-95% by 2050.

- Creates a cap and trade system, but doesn't detail whether carbon emissions would be auctioned off or given away or how revenue from the system would be spent. 

-  Creates a national Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS): 25% of electricity to be generated from clean sources by 2025.

-  Energy Efficiency Standard: reduce electricity use 15% by 2020 and natural gas use by 10%.

  • Retrofit for Energy and Environmental Performance (REEP) program: promotes comprehensive efficiency retrofits for homes and commercial buildings, reducing energy consumption by about 20%.
  • New efficiency standards: portable lighting fixtures (floor and table lamps); outdoor lighting fixtures for streets and parking lots; commercial furnaces; drinking water dispensers; hot tubs; and hot food holding cabinets (used to keep food warm before it is served).
  • Reforms the federal appliance standards program, clarifying ambiguous language and strengthening the the Secretary of Energy's authority to set standards that are "technically feasible" and "economically justified."
  • Building codes: new buildings would use 30% less energy starting in 2010 and 50% starting in 2016.
  • Building labeling program: owners and prospective buyers/ tenants would be able to compare the energy use of a particular home or building to similar buildings in the local area.
  • States would establish goals to reduce GHG from transportation; municipalities would submit plans to achieve the goals through zoning and land use, non-auto modes, and pricing strategies.
  • EPA would be required to develop GHG standards for heavy trucks, marine vessels, locomotives, and aircraft.
  • The role of EPA's SmartWay Transport Program would be expanded to maximize the efficiency of the nation's goods movement system.

- Caps emissions of F-gases, an important step to phasing out powerful pollutants that have hundreds to thousands of times greater global warming effects than CO2.

- Robust funding to stop international deforestation, which is responsible for 20% of global carbon emissions.

Potential Downsides:  

- 2 billion tons of pollution offsets - if all offsets were used, the bill's emissions reductions could be met without actually reducing fossil fuel emissions for 20 years.

- Billions of dollars for the coal industry to develop carbon capture and sequestration, a false promise.

 next »

Reader Comments (1)

Author:
John G.

Date Posted:
04/05/09 04:34 PM

I find it strange that we should "legislate" sustainable behavior rather than encourage it. Perhaps the government could be seen working with trade groups and associations to provide better information and labeling so that consumers make better choices. For instance, instead of "legislating" more efficient homes, perhaps home sellers should be required to do a better job revealing the underlying efficiency of the product their selling.

Add Your Comment

(Use any name, your real name is not required)
Type the characters you see in the picture below.

home |about us |contact us |advertise |feeds |privacy policy |disclosure

Compare Green Cars   |   Find Alternative Fueling Stations